GHSA-GQ8M-RWGG-6VV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:13 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:47
VLAI?
Details
libvirt version 2.3.0 and later is vulnerable to a bad default configuration of "verify-peer=no" passed to QEMU by libvirt resulting in a failure to validate SSL/TLS certificates by default.
Severity ?
8.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-1000256"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-31T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "libvirt version 2.3.0 and later is vulnerable to a bad default configuration of \"verify-peer=no\" passed to QEMU by libvirt resulting in a failure to validate SSL/TLS certificates by default.",
"id": "GHSA-gq8m-rwgg-6vv3",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:47:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:13:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1000256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist%40lists.debian.org/msg1556251.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1556251.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-announce/2017-October/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4003"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…