ghsa-gqgp-8xv7-mjfw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:17
Modified
2022-05-14 02:17
Details

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices with software 8.0 before 8.0(5.20), 8.1 before 8.1(2.48), 8.2 before 8.2(3), and 8.3 before 8.3(2.1), when the RIP protocol and the Cisco Phone Proxy functionality are configured, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a RIP update, aka Bug ID CSCtg66583.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-0395"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-02-25T12:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices with software 8.0 before 8.0(5.20), 8.1 before 8.1(2.48), 8.2 before 8.2(3), and 8.3 before 8.3(2.1), when the RIP protocol and the Cisco Phone Proxy functionality are configured, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a RIP update, aka Bug ID CSCtg66583.",
  "id": "GHSA-gqgp-8xv7-mjfw",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:17:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:17:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43488"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b6e14d.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0493"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.