GHSA-GQGX-HGVF-F75F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-21 15:30 – Updated: 2025-05-23 15:31
VLAI?
Details

When an incoming DNS protocol message includes a Transaction Signature (TSIG), BIND always checks it. If the TSIG contains an invalid value in the algorithm field, BIND immediately aborts with an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.8 and 9.21.0 through 9.21.7.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-40775"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-232"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-21T13:16:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "When an incoming DNS protocol message includes a Transaction Signature (TSIG), BIND always checks it.  If the TSIG contains an invalid value in the algorithm field, BIND immediately aborts with an assertion failure.\nThis issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.8 and 9.21.0 through 9.21.7.",
  "id": "GHSA-gqgx-hgvf-f75f",
  "modified": "2025-05-23T15:31:08Z",
  "published": "2025-05-21T15:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40775"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2025-40775"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250523-0001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/21/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…