ghsa-grpv-g4qc-62cg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-09-14 00:00
Modified
2022-09-17 00:00
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416Pv2 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG907R (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG908C (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG909R (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG910C (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions < v5.6.0). Affected devices improperly handle partial HTTP requests which makes them vulnerable to slowloris attacks. This could allow a remote attacker to create a denial of service condition that persists until the attack ends.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39158"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-13T10:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416Pv2 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG907R (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG908C (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG909R (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG910C (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions \u003c v5.6.0). Affected devices improperly handle partial HTTP requests which makes them vulnerable to slowloris attacks. This could allow a remote attacker to create a denial of service condition that persists until the attack ends.",
  "id": "GHSA-grpv-g4qc-62cg",
  "modified": "2022-09-17T00:00:31Z",
  "published": "2022-09-14T00:00:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39158"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-459643.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-787941.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.