GHSA-GRPV-G4QC-62CG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-14 00:00 – Updated: 2025-08-12 12:30
VLAI?
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416Pv2 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG907R (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG908C (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG909R (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG910C (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228P (All versions < V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions < v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions < v5.6.0). Affected devices improperly handle partial HTTP requests which makes them vulnerable to slowloris attacks. This could allow a remote attacker to create a denial of service condition that persists until the attack ends.

Severity ?
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39158"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-13T10:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416Pv2 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG907R (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG908C (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG909R (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG910C (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228P (All versions \u003c V5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions \u003c v5.6.0), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions \u003c v5.6.0). Affected devices improperly handle partial HTTP requests which makes them vulnerable to slowloris attacks. This could allow a remote attacker to create a denial of service condition that persists until the attack ends.",
  "id": "GHSA-grpv-g4qc-62cg",
  "modified": "2025-08-12T12:30:32Z",
  "published": "2022-09-14T00:00:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39158"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-459643.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-787941.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-459643.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-787941.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.