GHSA-GWHJ-73CJ-PHR2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ixgbevf: fix use-after-free in VEPA multicast source pruning

ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq() prunes frames whose source MAC matches the VF's own address (VEPA multicast workaround) by freeing the skb and continuing to the next descriptor:

dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
continue;

The skb pointer is declared outside the while loop and persists across iterations. Because the continue skips the "skb = NULL" reset at the bottom of the loop, the next iteration enters the "else if (skb)" path and calls ixgbevf_add_rx_frag() on the freed skb, dereferencing skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags - a use-after-free in NAPI softirq context.

The sibling driver iavf already handles this correctly by nulling the pointer before continuing. Apply the same pattern here.

I do not have ixgbevf hardware; the bug was found by static analysis (scan_drop_continue_loops.py + semgrep drop_continue_in_loop, multi-tool corroboration with the highest score in the scan). The UAF was confirmed under KASAN by loading a test module that reproduces the exact code pattern (alloc skb, kfree_skb, then read skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags):

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ixgbevf_uaf_test_init+0x100/0x1000 Read of size 8 at addr 000000006163ae78 by task insmod/30 freed 208-byte region [000000006163adc0, 000000006163ae90)

QEMU emulates igb (82576) but not ixgbe (82599), and the igbvf VF driver does not include the VEPA source pruning path, so a full end-to-end reproduction with emulated hardware was not possible.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64113"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:52Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nixgbevf: fix use-after-free in VEPA multicast source pruning\n\nixgbevf_clean_rx_irq() prunes frames whose source MAC matches the VF\u0027s\nown address (VEPA multicast workaround) by freeing the skb and\ncontinuing to the next descriptor:\n\n    dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);\n    continue;\n\nThe skb pointer is declared outside the while loop and persists across\niterations.  Because the continue skips the \"skb = NULL\" reset at the\nbottom of the loop, the next iteration enters the \"else if (skb)\" path\nand calls ixgbevf_add_rx_frag() on the freed skb, dereferencing\nskb_shinfo(skb)-\u003enr_frags - a use-after-free in NAPI softirq context.\n\nThe sibling driver iavf already handles this correctly by nulling the\npointer before continuing.  Apply the same pattern here.\n\nI do not have ixgbevf hardware; the bug was found by static analysis\n(scan_drop_continue_loops.py + semgrep drop_continue_in_loop, multi-tool\ncorroboration with the highest score in the scan).  The UAF was confirmed\nunder KASAN by loading a test module that reproduces the exact code\npattern (alloc skb, kfree_skb, then read skb_shinfo(skb)-\u003enr_frags):\n\n  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ixgbevf_uaf_test_init+0x100/0x1000\n  Read of size 8 at addr 000000006163ae78 by task insmod/30\n  freed 208-byte region [000000006163adc0, 000000006163ae90)\n\nQEMU emulates igb (82576) but not ixgbe (82599), and the igbvf VF\ndriver does not include the VEPA source pruning path, so a full\nend-to-end reproduction with emulated hardware was not possible.",
  "id": "GHSA-gwhj-73cj-phr2",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:32:00Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d931ac62411a7e43b85dba5fe45e1a4a91bd5cb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55b3e91d62b2f7a24109b2d7c9f4c66d2e3b1ec1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d49b568c188dc77199d8d2b959c91da8cc27cf1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ef30384a50a50e4a484cddf341bc27de31aa3de"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a244395d8c563ed1bb26c3ef708db6aeeaa08084"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/add70e2682c0ad3be2a5810bcf1bc13963ba4df9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dfef79e09ed2f5df975c98547f97f5d7f8982a24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8768bcbe5cd30c4ea36a22022c9ffaa66903693"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…