ghsa-h33q-qxcf-7vxx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:48
Modified
2022-05-14 02:48
Details

Hak5 WiFi Pineapple 2.0 through 2.3 uses predictable CSRF tokens.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-4624"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-31T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Hak5 WiFi Pineapple 2.0 through 2.3 uses predictable CSRF tokens.",
  "id": "GHSA-h33q-qxcf-7vxx",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:48:28Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:48:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4624"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40609"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/133052/WiFi-Pineapple-Predictable-CSRF-Token.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/139212/Hak5-WiFi-Pineapple-Preconfiguration-Command-Injection-2.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/536184/100/500/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.