GHSA-H3QW-GCPW-F6MG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:07 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:07
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer underflow in the modmul function in sshbn.c in PuTTY before 0.63 allows remote SSH servers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly trigger memory corruption or code execution via a crafted DSA signature, which is not properly handled when performing certain bit-shifting operations during modular multiplication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-4206"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-08-19T23:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer underflow in the modmul function in sshbn.c in PuTTY before 0.63 allows remote SSH servers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly trigger memory corruption or code execution via a crafted DSA signature, which is not properly handled when performing certain bit-shifting operations during modular multiplication.",
"id": "GHSA-h3qw-gcpw-f6mg",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:07:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:07:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4206"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00035.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54379"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54533"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty/sshbn.c?sortby=date\u0026r1=9977\u0026r2=9976\u0026pathrev=9977"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/vuln-modmul.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/06/11"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…