GHSA-H4PF-Q6RM-X45M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:14 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:46
VLAI?
Details
The ANTlabs InnGate firmware on IG 3100, IG 3101, InnGate 3.00 E, InnGate 3.01 E, InnGate 3.02 E, InnGate 3.10 E, InnGate 3.01 G, and InnGate 3.10 G devices does not require authentication for rsync sessions, which allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files via TCP traffic on port 873.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-0932"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-04-05T01:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The ANTlabs InnGate firmware on IG 3100, IG 3101, InnGate 3.00 E, InnGate 3.01 E, InnGate 3.02 E, InnGate 3.10 E, InnGate 3.01 G, and InnGate 3.10 G devices does not require authentication for rsync sessions, which allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files via TCP traffic on port 873.",
"id": "GHSA-h4pf-q6rm-x45m",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:46:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:14:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0932"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.cylance.com/spear-team-cve-2015-0932"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.antlabs.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=195:rsync-remote-file-system-access-vulnerability-cve-2015-0932\u0026catid=54:advisories\u0026Itemid=133"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/930956"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.wired.com/2015/03/big-vulnerability-hotel-wi-fi-router-puts-guests-risk"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…