GHSA-H4V9-XFR4-CH4G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:57 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:57
VLAI?
Details

Cisco ONS 15327 before 4.1(3), ONS 15454 before 4.6(1), ONS 15454 SD before 4.1(3), and Cisco ONS 15600 before 1.3(0) enable TFTP service on UDP port 69 by default, which allows remote attackers to GET or PUT ONS system files on the current active TCC in the /flash0 or /flash1 directories.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0306"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-11-23T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cisco ONS 15327 before 4.1(3), ONS 15454 before 4.6(1), ONS 15454 SD before 4.1(3), and Cisco ONS 15600 before 1.3(0) enable TFTP service on UDP port 69 by default, which allows remote attackers to GET or PUT ONS system files on the current active TCC in the /flash0 or /flash1 directories.",
  "id": "GHSA-h4v9-xfr4-ch4g",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:30Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0306"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15264"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040219-ONS.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9699"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…