GHSA-H4WV-R484-2RG5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: fix overflow in passthrough ioctl bounds check

smb2_ioctl_query_info() validates the PASSTHRU_FSCTL response payload before copying it to userspace.

The payload offset and length both come from 32-bit fields. The bounds check currently adds OutputOffset and qi.input_buffer_length directly, so the addition can wrap in 32-bit arithmetic before the result is compared against the response buffer length.

A malicious server can use a large OutputOffset and a small OutputCount to make the wrapped sum pass the bounds check. The later copy_to_user() then reads from io_rsp + OutputOffset, outside the response buffer.

Use size_add() for the offset plus length check so overflow is treated as out of bounds.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72310"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:03Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: fix overflow in passthrough ioctl bounds check\n\nsmb2_ioctl_query_info() validates the PASSTHRU_FSCTL response payload\nbefore copying it to userspace.\n\nThe payload offset and length both come from 32-bit fields. The bounds\ncheck currently adds OutputOffset and qi.input_buffer_length directly, so\nthe addition can wrap in 32-bit arithmetic before the result is compared\nagainst the response buffer length.\n\nA malicious server can use a large OutputOffset and a small OutputCount\nto make the wrapped sum pass the bounds check. The later copy_to_user()\nthen reads from io_rsp + OutputOffset, outside the response buffer.\n\nUse size_add() for the offset plus length check so overflow is treated as\nout of bounds.",
  "id": "GHSA-h4wv-r484-2rg5",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:22Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72310"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/160045fc943f6c46b227644261252c8a22b8a87a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1627e7d5c9b09721a141d07cedb178882f1ded67"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/175357ee0c596cb82054650dfa32fda51ad35aaa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a638c55f2db6cb2296e5e3138015dd8fd9d4aa9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63feb687e89a3a52a31e6e01764117cc500f1974"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4f27ad055392fa164f5649e89a3637b033c5fcc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b30771b69eafae750afb7385fbcc3d77ed3f3670"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd126539c098dba3159ce7d34b10b2daddcbd0f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…