ghsa-h5px-p7wm-gqpv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-17 12:32
Modified
2024-04-17 12:32
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm-integrity: fix a memory leak when rechecking the data
Memory for the "checksums" pointer will leak if the data is rechecked after checksum failure (because the associated kfree won't happen due to 'goto skip_io').
Fix this by freeing the checksums memory before recheck, and just use the "checksum_onstack" memory for storing checksum during recheck.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-26860" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-17T11:15:08Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndm-integrity: fix a memory leak when rechecking the data\n\nMemory for the \"checksums\" pointer will leak if the data is rechecked\nafter checksum failure (because the associated kfree won\u0027t happen due\nto \u0027goto skip_io\u0027).\n\nFix this by freeing the checksums memory before recheck, and just use\nthe \"checksum_onstack\" memory for storing checksum during recheck.", "id": "GHSA-h5px-p7wm-gqpv", "modified": "2024-04-17T12:32:04Z", "published": "2024-04-17T12:32:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26860" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20e21c3c0195d915f33bc7321ee6b362177bf5bf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/338580a7fb9b0930bb38098007e89cc0fc496bf7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55e565c42dce81a4e49c13262d5bc4eb4c2e588a" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d35654f03c35c273240d85ec67e3f2c3596c4e0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74abc2fe09691f3d836d8a54d599ca71f1e4287b" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.