GHSA-H5XG-99X8-Q54P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:39 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:46
VLAI?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in tftpserver.exe in HP Intelligent Management Center (IMC) 5.0 before E0101L02 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mode field.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1851"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-05-13T17:05:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in tftpserver.exe in HP Intelligent Management Center (IMC) 5.0 before E0101L02 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mode field.",
  "id": "GHSA-h5xg-99x8-q54p",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:46:54Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:39:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1851"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02822750"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1025519"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47789"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-163"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…