ghsa-h64v-56v4-2q6j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:00
Modified
2022-05-17 02:00
Details
Mutt does not verify that the smtps server hostname matches the domain name of the subject of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL SMTP server via an arbitrary certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3766.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1429"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-03-16T22:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Mutt does not verify that the smtps server hostname matches the domain name of the subject of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL SMTP server via an arbitrary certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3766.",
"id": "GHSA-h64v-56v4-2q6j",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:00:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1429"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061353.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061356.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061461.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Mar/87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0959.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46803"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.