GHSA-H64V-56V4-2Q6J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:00 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:00
VLAI?
Details
Mutt does not verify that the smtps server hostname matches the domain name of the subject of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL SMTP server via an arbitrary certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3766.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1429"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-03-16T22:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Mutt does not verify that the smtps server hostname matches the domain name of the subject of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL SMTP server via an arbitrary certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3766.",
"id": "GHSA-h64v-56v4-2q6j",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:00:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1429"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061353.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061356.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-June/061461.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Mar/87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0959.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46803"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…