GHSA-H67P-54HQ-RP68

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 17:15 – Updated: 2026-06-29 15:05
VLAI
Summary
JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases
Details

Summary

A crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in js-yaml merge-key processing (<<) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.
This causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.

Details

The issue is in merge handling inside lib/loader.js:

  • storeMappingPair(...) iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag is tag:yaml.org,2002:merge.
  • For each element, it calls mergeMappings(...).
  • mergeMappings(...) computes Object.keys(source) and performs _hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key) checks for each key.

When input is of the form:

a: &a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0} b: {<<: [a, a, a, ... repeated M times ...]} all a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time. Resulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows. Relevant code path: lib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') lib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)

Root cause

File: lib/loader.js Function: storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode, valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos) Lines: ~359-366

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode[index], overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}

When the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 <<: [ a, a, ... ]), each element is handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does

sourceKeys = Object.keys(source);
for (index = 0; index < sourceKeys.length; index += 1) {
  key = sourceKeys[index];
  if (!_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)) {
    setProperty(destination, key, source[key]);
    overridableKeys[key] = true;
  }
}

Every alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object via state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same reference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:

  • one Object.keys(source) call (O(K))
  • K _hasOwnProperty.call checks on the destination

Total: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final object and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.

YAML semantics for <<: are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources, so collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn't a spec trade-off.

PoC

Environment: js-yaml version: 4.1.1 Node.js: v24.5.0 Platform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently) Reproduction script: Create many keys in one anchored map (&a). Merge that same alias repeatedly via <<: [a, a, ...]. Measure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (<<: *a). Observed repeated runs (same machine): K=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33–36 ms K=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121–123 ms K=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524–537 ms K=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608–1,829 ms K=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395–3,565 ms Control (single merge, similar key counts): K=2000: ~1–2 ms K=4000: ~3 ms K=8000: ~5 ms Also verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.

Impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity). Any service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.

Suggested fix:

Dedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of the following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:

dedupe in storeMappingPair:

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    var seen = new Set();
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      var src = valueNode[index];
      if (seen.has(src)) continue;   // idempotent; skip redundant alias
      seen.add(src);
      mergeMappings(state, _result, src, overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "js-yaml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "js-yaml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.15.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53550"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T17:15:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-22T16:16:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in `js-yaml` merge-key processing (`\u003c\u003c`) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.  \nThis causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.\n\n### Details\nThe issue is in merge handling inside `lib/loader.js`:\n\n- `storeMappingPair(...)` iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag is `tag:yaml.org,2002:merge`.\n- For each element, it calls `mergeMappings(...)`.\n- `mergeMappings(...)` computes `Object.keys(source)` and performs `_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)` checks for each key.\n\nWhen input is of the form:\n\na: \u0026a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0}\nb: {\u003c\u003c: [*a, *a, *a, ... repeated M times ...]}\nall *a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time.\nResulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows.\nRelevant code path:\nlib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:merge\u0027)\nlib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)\n\n\n### Root cause\nFile:       lib/loader.js\nFunction:   storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode,\n                             valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos)\nLines:      ~359-366\n\n    if (keyTag === \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:merge\u0027) {\n      if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {\n        for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index \u003c quantity; index += 1) {\n          mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode[index], overridableKeys);\n        }\n      } else {\n        mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);\n      }\n    }\n\nWhen the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 \u003c\u003c: [ *a, *a, ... ]), each element\nis handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does\n\n    sourceKeys = Object.keys(source);\n    for (index = 0; index \u003c sourceKeys.length; index += 1) {\n      key = sourceKeys[index];\n      if (!_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)) {\n        setProperty(destination, key, source[key]);\n        overridableKeys[key] = true;\n      }\n    }\n\nEvery alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object\nvia state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same\nreference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:\n\n  * one Object.keys(source) call (O(K))\n  * K _hasOwnProperty.call checks on the destination\n\nTotal: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final\nobject and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.\n\nYAML semantics for `\u003c\u003c:` are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources,\nso collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn\u0027t a spec trade-off.\n\n\n### PoC\nEnvironment:\njs-yaml version: 4.1.1\nNode.js: v24.5.0\nPlatform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently)\nReproduction script:\nCreate many keys in one anchored map (\u0026a).\nMerge that same alias repeatedly via \u003c\u003c: [*a, *a, ...].\nMeasure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (\u003c\u003c: *a).\nObserved repeated runs (same machine):\nK=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33\u201336 ms\nK=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121\u2013123 ms\nK=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524\u2013537 ms\nK=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608\u20131,829 ms\nK=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395\u20133,565 ms\nControl (single merge, similar key counts):\nK=2000: ~1\u20132 ms\nK=4000: ~3 ms\nK=8000: ~5 ms\nAlso verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.\n\n\n### Impact\nThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity).\nAny service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.\n\n### Suggested fix:\nDedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of\nthe following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:\n\ndedupe in storeMappingPair:\n\n    if (keyTag === \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:merge\u0027) {\n      if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {\n        var seen = new Set();\n        for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index \u003c quantity; index += 1) {\n          var src = valueNode[index];\n          if (seen.has(src)) continue;   // idempotent; skip redundant alias\n          seen.add(src);\n          mergeMappings(state, _result, src, overridableKeys);\n        }\n      } else {\n        mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);\n      }\n    }",
  "id": "GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68",
  "modified": "2026-06-29T15:05:57Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T17:15:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/security/advisories/GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53550"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…