GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-H6X4-53V9-P3RG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ntfs: validate non-resident attribute offsets

ntfs_attr_update_meta() shifts the attribute name when converting between non-sparse and sparse attributes. Converting to sparse also adds the compressed_size field before the name and mapping pairs, requiring eight additional bytes in the attribute record.

However, the validator does not check that name_offset is within safe boundaries for these operations or that the additional space is available. A malicious MFT record could set name_offset such that:

  1. The name is positioned at the very end of a non-sparse attribute. Converting to sparse would shift the name forward by 8 bytes, writing beyond the attribute boundary.

  2. The name overlaps with the mapping pairs, causing corruption during conversion.

Add validation to ensure: - For named attributes, name_offset is within valid bounds - Name does not extend beyond the attribute or overlap with mapping pairs - For non-sparse, non-compressed attributes, eight bytes are available after mapping_pairs_offset for the compressed_size field

The space check also covers unnamed attributes, for which name_offset = 0 is valid and no name range needs to be checked.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89611"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:46Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nntfs: validate non-resident attribute offsets\n\nntfs_attr_update_meta() shifts the attribute name when converting between\nnon-sparse and sparse attributes. Converting to sparse also adds the\ncompressed_size field before the name and mapping pairs, requiring eight\nadditional bytes in the attribute record.\n\nHowever, the validator does not check that name_offset is within safe\nboundaries for these operations or that the additional space is available.\nA malicious MFT record could set name_offset such that:\n\n1. The name is positioned at the very end of a non-sparse attribute.\n   Converting to sparse would shift the name forward by 8 bytes,\n   writing beyond the attribute boundary.\n\n2. The name overlaps with the mapping pairs, causing corruption during\n   conversion.\n\nAdd validation to ensure:\n- For named attributes, name_offset is within valid bounds\n- Name does not extend beyond the attribute or overlap with mapping pairs\n- For non-sparse, non-compressed attributes, eight bytes are available\n  after mapping_pairs_offset for the compressed_size field\n\nThe space check also covers unnamed attributes, for which name_offset = 0\nis valid and no name range needs to be checked.",
  "id": "GHSA-h6x4-53v9-p3rg",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:20Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89611"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a83e82b0ec3ae523028e24813f23f18b43e8fc1c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd7b3dc7557faadeea626034e3bac68a449851ef"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…