GHSA-H72J-P4F7-VRCJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-04 12:30 – Updated: 2026-08-19 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

af_unix: Set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().

Igor Ushakov reported that unix_gc() could run with gc_in_progress being false if the work is scheduled while running:

Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 -------- -------- -------- unix_schedule_gc() unix_schedule_gc() - if (!gc_in_progress)- if (!gc_in_progress) |- gc_in_progress = true | - queue_work() | unix_gc() <----------------/ | | |- gc_in_progress = true ...- queue_work() | | - gc_in_progress = false | | unix_gc() <---------------------------------------------' | ... /* gc_in_progress == false */ |- gc_in_progress = false

unix_peek_fpl() relies on gc_in_progress not to confuse GC by MSG_PEEK.

Let's set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53361"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-04T12:17:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: Set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().\n\nIgor Ushakov reported that unix_gc() could run with gc_in_progress\nbeing false if the work is scheduled while running:\n\n  Thread 1         Thread 2                     Thread 3\n  --------         --------                     --------\n                   unix_schedule_gc()           unix_schedule_gc()\n                   `- if (!gc_in_progress)      `- if (!gc_in_progress)\n                      |- gc_in_progress = true     |\n                      `- queue_work()              |\n  unix_gc() \u003c----------------/                     |\n  |                                                |- gc_in_progress = true\n  ...                                              `- queue_work()\n  |                                                       |\n  `- gc_in_progress = false                               |\n                                                          |\n  unix_gc() \u003c---------------------------------------------\u0027\n  |\n  ... /* gc_in_progress == false */\n  |\n  `- gc_in_progress = false\n\nunix_peek_fpl() relies on gc_in_progress not to confuse GC\nby MSG_PEEK.\n\nLet\u0027s set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().",
  "id": "GHSA-h72j-p4f7-vrcj",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T18:31:59Z",
  "published": "2026-07-04T12:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53361"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cfa78c050662784fc8e3ab26dbfd1dc632b2082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20aa894d475bd8086b25c1113ec4ca70f70c7a98"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/591f1ac217428a6d2b32a8ac14aac0fab44f155a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82c17e13d404f686e164590483fd6c1abaa675d0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d82ba05263c69fa2437fe93e4e561cc40f4c03af"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…