GHSA-H9GG-52H2-VQV9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:50
VLAI?
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in Trend Micro AntiVirus Library VSAPI before 7.510, as used in multiple Trend Micro products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARJ file with long header file names that modify pointers within a structure.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-0533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Trend Micro AntiVirus Library VSAPI before 7.510, as used in multiple Trend Micro products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARJ file with long header file names that modify pointers within a structure.",
  "id": "GHSA-h9gg-52h2-vqv9",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:50:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:50:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14396"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1013289"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1013290"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12643"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/secadvisories/default6.asp?VName=Vulnerability+in+VSAPI+ARJ+parsing+could+allow+Remote+Code+execution"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/189"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…