GHSA-H9MR-6GJH-QMFH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:14 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:14
VLAI?
Details
Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-3058"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.",
"id": "GHSA-h9mr-6gjh-qmfh",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:14:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:14:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18844"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…