ghsa-h9rv-jmmf-4pgx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2019-12-05 18:44
Modified
2021-01-08 18:42
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting in serialize-javascript
Details
Versions of serialize-javascript
prior to 2.1.1 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The package fails to sanitize serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability does not affect Node.js applications.
Recommendation
Upgrade to version 2.1.1 or later.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "npm", name: "serialize-javascript", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "2.1.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-16769", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-79", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2020-06-16T21:39:51Z", nvd_published_at: null, severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Versions of `serialize-javascript` prior to 2.1.1 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The package fails to sanitize serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability does not affect Node.js applications.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpgrade to version 2.1.1 or later.", id: "GHSA-h9rv-jmmf-4pgx", modified: "2021-01-08T18:42:22Z", published: "2019-12-05T18:44:37Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-h9rv-jmmf-4pgx", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16769", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h9rv-jmmf-4pgx", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/1426", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Cross-Site Scripting in serialize-javascript", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.