GHSA-HCR5-WV4P-H2G2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-29 20:47 – Updated: 2025-02-05 16:28
VLAI?
Summary
kube-audit-rest's example logging configuration could disclose secret values in the audit log
Details
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? The example has been updated to fix this in commit 9df8886b4819409f566233adc7c3b7a43a4096ba
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Replace
if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
del(.request.object.data)
.request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
del(.request.oldObject.data)
.request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
}
In the vector "audit-files-json-parser-and-redaction" step with
if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
# Redact the secret data
del(.request.object.data)
.request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
del(.request.oldObject.data)
.request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
# Remove the previously set secret data - Not bothering to parse it as this annotation shouldn't ever be needed
del(.request.object.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
del(.request.oldObject.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
}
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/RichardoC/kube-audit-rest"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20250205113217-9df8886b4819"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24884"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-532"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-29T20:47:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-29T21:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nIf the \"full-elastic-stack\" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\nThe example has been updated to fix this in commit 9df8886b4819409f566233adc7c3b7a43a4096ba\n\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nReplace \n```yaml\n\n if .request.requestKind.kind == \"Secret\" {\n del(.request.object.data)\n .request.object.data.redacted = \"REDACTED\"\n del(.request.oldObject.data)\n .request.oldObject.data.redacted = \"REDACTED\"\n }\n```\nIn the vector \"audit-files-json-parser-and-redaction\" step\nwith\n```yaml\n\n if .request.requestKind.kind == \"Secret\" {\n # Redact the secret data\n del(.request.object.data)\n .request.object.data.redacted = \"REDACTED\"\n del(.request.oldObject.data)\n .request.oldObject.data.redacted = \"REDACTED\"\n # Remove the previously set secret data - Not bothering to parse it as this annotation shouldn\u0027t ever be needed\n del(.request.object.metadata.annotations.[\"kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration\"])\n del(.request.oldObject.metadata.annotations.[\"kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration\"])\n }\n```\n\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_",
"id": "GHSA-hcr5-wv4p-h2g2",
"modified": "2025-02-05T16:28:49Z",
"published": "2025-01-29T20:47:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RichardoC/kube-audit-rest/security/advisories/GHSA-hcr5-wv4p-h2g2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24884"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RichardoC/kube-audit-rest/commit/db1aa5b867256b0a7bf206544c6981ab068b73dc"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/RichardoC/kube-audit-rest"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3431"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "kube-audit-rest\u0027s example logging configuration could disclose secret values in the audit log"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…