ghsa-hp2h-pvm5-7jph
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:48
Modified
2022-05-17 05:48
Details

Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x before 6.1(5), 7.0 before 7.0(2a)su3, 7.1su before 7.1(3b)su2, 7.1 before 7.1(5), and 8.0 before 8.0(1) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or voice-services outage) via a SIP REFER request with an invalid Refer-To header, aka Bug IDs CSCta20040 and CSCta31358.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-2835"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-09-23T19:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x before 6.1(5), 7.0 before 7.0(2a)su3, 7.1su before 7.1(3b)su2, 7.1 before 7.1(5), and 8.0 before 8.0(1) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or voice-services outage) via a SIP REFER request with an invalid Refer-To header, aka Bug IDs CSCta20040 and CSCta31358.",
  "id": "GHSA-hp2h-pvm5-7jph",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:48:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:48:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2835"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b4a30f.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b4a313.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.