ghsa-hp68-7f8q-r2qj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-02-07 18:30
Modified
2023-02-16 15:30
Details

TerraMaster NAS 4.2.29 and earlier allows remote attackers to discover the administrative password by sending "User-Agent: TNAS" to module/api.php?mobile/webNasIPS and then reading the PWD field in the response.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24990"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-02-07T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TerraMaster NAS 4.2.29 and earlier allows remote attackers to discover the administrative password by sending \"User-Agent: TNAS\" to module/api.php?mobile/webNasIPS and then reading the PWD field in the response.",
  "id": "GHSA-hp68-7f8q-r2qj",
  "modified": "2023-02-16T15:30:29Z",
  "published": "2023-02-07T18:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24990"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://forum.terra-master.com/en/viewforum.php?f=28"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xf4n9x/CVE-2022-24990"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://octagon.net/blog/2022/03/07/cve-2022-24990-terrmaster-tos-unauthenticated-remote-command-execution-via-php-object-instantiation"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.broadcom.com/support/security-center/attacksignatures/detail?asid=33732"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172904/TerraMaster-TOS-4.2.29-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.