GHSA-HQ79-CP3F-MCR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:03 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:03
VLAI?
Details
Gaim before 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed MSN message that leads to a memory allocation of a large size, possibly due to an integer signedness error.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-1934"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-19T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Gaim before 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed MSN message that leads to a memory allocation of a large size, possibly due to an integer signedness error.",
"id": "GHSA-hq79-cp3f-mcr5",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:03:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:03:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1934"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10368"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200506-11.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail\u0026aid=1205290\u0026group_id=235\u0026atid=100235"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:099"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_36_sudo.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-518.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426078/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13932"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…