GHSA-HQM4-73MW-3X29

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:28
VLAI
Details

The web server in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 6.1 and 8.5 produces different responses for directory queries depending on whether the directory exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate directory names via a series of queries, aka Bug ID CSCtt94070.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-4232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-05-03T10:11:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The web server in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 6.1 and 8.5 produces different responses for directory queries depending on whether the directory exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate directory names via a series of queries, aka Bug ID CSCtt94070.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqm4-73mw-3x29",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:58Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/meetingplace/6_1/release_notes/mp61_rn.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53432"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…