ghsa-hqpx-mggj-gjxq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:47
Modified
2022-05-17 03:47
Details

Memory leak in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 8.5(x) before 8.5(1)su6, 8.6(x) before 8.6(2a)su3, and 9.x before 9.1(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service disruption) via a high rate of UDP packets, aka Bug ID CSCub85597.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-3460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-08-25T03:27:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory leak in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 8.5(x) before 8.5(1)su6, 8.6(x) before 8.6(2a)su3, and 9.x before 9.1(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service disruption) via a high rate of UDP packets, aka Bug ID CSCub85597.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqpx-mggj-gjxq",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:47:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:47:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130821-cucm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028938"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.