ghsa-hrf4-f43m-jqm2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:06
Modified
2022-05-17 01:06
Details
The page serializer in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73 mishandles Mark of the Web (MOTW) comments for URLs containing a "--" sequence, which might allow remote attackers to inject HTML via a crafted URL, as demonstrated by an initial http://example.com?-- substring.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-6784" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-12-06T01:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The page serializer in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73 mishandles Mark of the Web (MOTW) comments for URLs containing a \"--\" sequence, which might allow remote attackers to inject HTML via a crafted URL, as demonstrated by an initial http://example.com?-- substring.", "id": "GHSA-hrf4-f43m-jqm2", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:06:31Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:06:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-6784" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=503217" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://codereview.chromium.org/1371323003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-09" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2015/12/stable-channel-update.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00016.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00017.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3415" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/78416" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034298" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2825-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.