GHSA-HV2H-86HC-65FP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:22 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:22
VLAI?
Details

The finger daemon (in.fingerd) in Sun Solaris 7 through 9 allows remote attackers to list all accounts that have certain nonstandard GECOS fields via a request composed of a single digit, as demonstrated by a "finger 9@host" command, a different vulnerability than CVE-2001-1503.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-4310"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-08-13T21:17:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The finger daemon (in.fingerd) in Sun Solaris 7 through 9 allows remote attackers to list all accounts that have certain nonstandard GECOS fields via a request composed of a single digit, as demonstrated by a \"finger 9@host\" command, a different vulnerability than CVE-2001-1503.",
  "id": "GHSA-hv2h-86hc-65fp",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:22:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:22:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4310"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2996"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/474858/100/100/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/474927/100/100/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…