GHSA-HV59-HH7H-7H9R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-31 12:30 – Updated: 2026-01-31 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu/userq: Fix fence reference leak on queue teardown v2

The user mode queue keeps a pointer to the most recent fence in userq->last_fence. This pointer holds an extra dma_fence reference.

When the queue is destroyed, we free the fence driver and its xarray, but we forgot to drop the last_fence reference.

Because of the missing dma_fence_put(), the last fence object can stay alive when the driver unloads. This leaves an allocated object in the amdgpu_userq_fence slab cache and triggers

This is visible during driver unload as:

BUG amdgpu_userq_fence: Objects remaining on __kmem_cache_shutdown() kmem_cache_destroy amdgpu_userq_fence: Slab cache still has objects Call Trace: kmem_cache_destroy amdgpu_userq_fence_slab_fini amdgpu_exit __do_sys_delete_module

Fix this by putting userq->last_fence and clearing the pointer during amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_free().

This makes sure the fence reference is released and the slab cache is empty when the module exits.

v2: Update to only release userq->last_fence with dma_fence_put() (Christian)

(cherry picked from commit 8e051e38a8d45caf6a866d4ff842105b577953bb)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23034"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-31T12:16:06Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu/userq: Fix fence reference leak on queue teardown v2\n\nThe user mode queue keeps a pointer to the most recent fence in\nuserq-\u003elast_fence. This pointer holds an extra dma_fence reference.\n\nWhen the queue is destroyed, we free the fence driver and its xarray,\nbut we forgot to drop the last_fence reference.\n\nBecause of the missing dma_fence_put(), the last fence object can stay\nalive when the driver unloads. This leaves an allocated object in the\namdgpu_userq_fence slab cache and triggers\n\nThis is visible during driver unload as:\n\n  BUG amdgpu_userq_fence: Objects remaining on __kmem_cache_shutdown()\n  kmem_cache_destroy amdgpu_userq_fence: Slab cache still has objects\n  Call Trace:\n    kmem_cache_destroy\n    amdgpu_userq_fence_slab_fini\n    amdgpu_exit\n    __do_sys_delete_module\n\nFix this by putting userq-\u003elast_fence and clearing the pointer during\namdgpu_userq_fence_driver_free().\n\nThis makes sure the fence reference is released and the slab cache is\nempty when the module exits.\n\nv2: Update to only release userq-\u003elast_fence with dma_fence_put()\n    (Christian)\n\n(cherry picked from commit 8e051e38a8d45caf6a866d4ff842105b577953bb)",
  "id": "GHSA-hv59-hh7h-7h9r",
  "modified": "2026-01-31T12:30:12Z",
  "published": "2026-01-31T12:30:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23034"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2426a211dba6432e32a2e70e9183c6e134475c6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1a30e1ab33fc522785d04bbf7e1b13a5c5c9175"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…