ghsa-hvcx-6rqp-7fpg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:53
Modified
2022-05-01 06:53
Details
Integer signedness error in Opera before 8.54 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long values in a stylesheet attribute, which pass a length check. NOTE: a sign extension problem makes the attack easier with shorter strings.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-1834" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-04-19T16:06:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Integer signedness error in Opera before 8.54 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long values in a stylesheet attribute, which pass a length check. NOTE: a sign extension problem makes the attack easier with shorter strings.", "id": "GHSA-hvcx-6rqp-7fpg", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:53:14Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:53:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1834" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25829" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-May/0004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114493114031891\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20117" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200606-01.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015912" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/854" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.sec-consult.com/259.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430876/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17513" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1354" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.