ghsa-hvfc-r626-888m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2022-05-14 03:59
Details
PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /(((a\2)|(a)\g<-1>))/ pattern and related patterns with certain internal recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-2327" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-12-02T01:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /(((a\\2)|(a*)\\g\u003c-1\u003e))*/ pattern and related patterns with certain internal recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.", "id": "GHSA-hvfc-r626-888m", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:59:18Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:59:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2327" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1503" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-17252" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-VD-15-010" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74924" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.