GHSA-HVH3-XPR5-C2C8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:14 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:44
VLAI?
Details
In coders/ps.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSImage() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large "extent" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over "length" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-14172"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-834"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-09-07T06:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In coders/ps.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSImage() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large \"extent\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over \"length\" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.",
"id": "GHSA-hvh3-xpr5-c2c8",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:44:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:14:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/715"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/bdbbb13f1fe9b7e2465502c500561720f7456aac"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…