GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-HVVG-V8HJ-GPV8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-18 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access

Use __va(phys) instead of virt_addr + linear_offset for the kaddr return in __fsdev_dax_direct_access(). The previous code added a device-linear byte offset to virt_addr (which is __va of ranges[0]), but for multi-range devices with physical gaps between ranges, this linear arithmetic crosses the gap and produces a wrong kernel virtual address. Using __va(phys) where phys comes from dax_pgoff_to_phys() is correct for any range layout because the direct map translates each physical address independently.

This leaves dev_dax->virt_addr write-only, so remove the field (suggested by Dave Jiang).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-93074"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:18:01Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access\n\nUse __va(phys) instead of virt_addr + linear_offset for the kaddr\nreturn in __fsdev_dax_direct_access(). The previous code added a\ndevice-linear byte offset to virt_addr (which is __va of ranges[0]),\nbut for multi-range devices with physical gaps between ranges, this\nlinear arithmetic crosses the gap and produces a wrong kernel virtual\naddress. Using __va(phys) where phys comes from dax_pgoff_to_phys()\nis correct for any range layout because the direct map translates\neach physical address independently.\n\nThis leaves dev_dax-\u003evirt_addr write-only, so remove the field\n(suggested by Dave Jiang).",
  "id": "GHSA-hvvg-v8hj-gpv8",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T18:31:33Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:32:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93074"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b642bd3d39105eef4d5908970726c5fda291b53"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff7c73fca793bd5c29a15ba735b0886f62f3a840"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…