GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-HW95-CHC9-4W36

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-22 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-26 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails

Have nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete failed commands.

Description of the problem: nvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure, e.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the "queue_response" callback, this results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will call nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is different from DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() when nvmet_req_init() fails.

Steps to reproduce: On the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli, For example the admin command "security receive" $ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096

This triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod->dma_dir is still in the default state of "DMA_NONE" as set by default in nvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called. Because nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also called in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a double completion. This not only sends two completions to the host but also corrupts the state of the PCI NVMe target leading to kernel oops.

This patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete all failed commands, and removes the double completion case in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where double completions occurred.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38658"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-908"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-22T16:15:40Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails\n\nHave nvmet_req_init() and req-\u003eexecute() complete failed commands.\n\nDescription of the problem:\nnvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure,\ne.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the \"queue_response\" callback,\nthis results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will\ncall nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is\ndifferent from DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as\nnvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod()\nwhen nvmet_req_init() fails.\n\nSteps to reproduce:\nOn the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli,\nFor example the admin command \"security receive\"\n$ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096\n\nThis triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and\nnvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod-\u003edma_dir is still\nin the default state of \"DMA_NONE\" as set by default in\nnvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called.\nBecause nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also\ncalled in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a double completion.\nThis not only sends two completions to the host but also corrupts the\nstate of the PCI NVMe target leading to kernel oops.\n\nThis patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req-\u003eexecute() complete all failed\ncommands, and removes the double completion case in\nnvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where\ndouble completions occurred.",
  "id": "GHSA-hw95-chc9-4w36",
  "modified": "2025-11-26T18:31:01Z",
  "published": "2025-08-22T18:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38658"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/746d0ac5a07d5da952ef258dd4d75f0b26c96476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a535c0b10060bc8c174a7964b0f98064ee0c4774"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…