ghsa-hwgv-6mjr-cw48
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood
The mitigation was intended to stop the irq completely. That may be better than a hard lock-up but it turns out that you get a crash anyway if you're using pmac_zilog as a serial console:
ttyPZ0: pmz: rx irq flood ! BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, swapper/0
That's because the pr_err() call in pmz_receive_chars() results in pmz_console_write() attempting to lock a spinlock already locked in pmz_interrupt(). With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y, this produces a fatal BUG splat. The spinlock in question is the one in struct uart_port.
Even when it's not fatal, the serial port rx function ceases to work. Also, the iteration limit doesn't play nicely with QEMU, as can be seen in the bug report linked below.
A web search for other reports of the error message "pmz: rx irq flood" didn't produce anything. So I don't think this code is needed any more. Remove it.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26999"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-01T06:15:17Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nserial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood\n\nThe mitigation was intended to stop the irq completely. That may be\nbetter than a hard lock-up but it turns out that you get a crash anyway\nif you\u0027re using pmac_zilog as a serial console:\n\nttyPZ0: pmz: rx irq flood !\nBUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, swapper/0\n\nThat\u0027s because the pr_err() call in pmz_receive_chars() results in\npmz_console_write() attempting to lock a spinlock already locked in\npmz_interrupt(). With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y, this produces a fatal\nBUG splat. The spinlock in question is the one in struct uart_port.\n\nEven when it\u0027s not fatal, the serial port rx function ceases to work.\nAlso, the iteration limit doesn\u0027t play nicely with QEMU, as can be\nseen in the bug report linked below.\n\nA web search for other reports of the error message \"pmz: rx irq flood\"\ndidn\u0027t produce anything. So I don\u0027t think this code is needed any more.\nRemove it.",
"id": "GHSA-hwgv-6mjr-cw48",
"modified": "2024-06-26T00:31:39Z",
"published": "2024-05-01T06:31:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1be3226445362bfbf461c92a5bcdb1723f2e4907"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52aaf1ff14622a04148dbb9ccce6d9de5d534ea7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69a02273e288011b521ee7c1f3ab2c23fda633ce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a3bbe41efa55323b6ea3c35fa15941d4dbecdef"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab86cf6f8d24e63e9aca23da5108af1aa5483928"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bbaafbb4651fede8d3c3881601ecaa4f834f9d3f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca09dfc3cfdf89e6af3ac24e1c6c0be5c575a729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d679c816929d62af51c8e6d7fc0e165c9412d2f3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4EZ6PJW7VOZ224TD7N4JZNU6KV32ZJ53"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DAMSOZXJEPUOXW33WZYWCVAY7Z5S7OOY"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCBZZEC7L7KTWWAS2NLJK6SO3IZIL4WW"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.