GHSA-HWPP-QFQF-G7FR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:41 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:26Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle. It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-0586"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-02-08T01:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle. It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues.",
"id": "GHSA-hwpp-qfqf-g7fr",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:26:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:41:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24195"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24197"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-January/041498.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-January/041499.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22839"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22840"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_cpu_jan_2006.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv$ft.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv$ft_int.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv%24ft.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv%24ft_int.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/422423/30/7370/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/422424/30/7370/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16294"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.