GHSA-HX58-3FX6-HP8M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-12 15:31 – Updated: 2025-01-07 18:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: zoned: allocate dummy checksums for zoned NODATASUM writes
Shin'ichiro reported that when he's running fstests' test-case btrfs/167 on emulated zoned devices, he's seeing the following NULL pointer dereference in 'btrfs_zone_finish_endio()':
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000011: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f] CPU: 4 PID: 2332440 Comm: kworker/u80:15 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-kts+ #4 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffff88867f107a90 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff893e5534 RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088 RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1081696028 R10: ffff88840b4b0143 R11: ffff88834dfff600 R12: ffff88840b4b0000 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888530ad5210 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888e3f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f87223fff38 CR3: 00000007a7c6a002 CR4: 00000000007706f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die_addr+0x46/0x70 ? exc_general_protection+0x14f/0x250 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x5d9/0x19a0 [btrfs] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_write_lock+0x90/0x260 ? __pfx_do_raw_write_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x23/0x40 ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x5a9/0x850 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0x435/0x500 btrfs_work_helper+0x1b1/0xa70 [btrfs] ? __schedule+0x10a8/0x60b0 ? __pfxmightresched+0x10/0x10 process_one_work+0x862/0x1410 ? pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240 worker_thread+0x5e6/0x1010 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0 ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xce/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Enabling CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT revealed the following assertion to trigger:
assertion failed: !list_empty(&ordered->list), in fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1815
This indicates, that we're missing the checksums list on the ordered_extent. As btrfs/167 is doing a NOCOW write this is to be expected.
Further analysis with drgn confirmed the assumption:
inode = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[11]['ordered'].inode btrfs_inode = drgn.container_of(inode, "struct btrfs_inode", \ "vfs_inode") print(btrfs_inode.flags) (u32)1
As zoned emulation mode simulates conventional zones on regular devices, we cannot use zone-append for writing. But we're only attaching dummy checksums if we're doing a zone-append write.
So for NOCOW zoned data writes on conventional zones, also attach a dummy checksum.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-40962"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-12T13:15:18Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: zoned: allocate dummy checksums for zoned NODATASUM writes\n\nShin\u0027ichiro reported that when he\u0027s running fstests\u0027 test-case\nbtrfs/167 on emulated zoned devices, he\u0027s seeing the following NULL\npointer dereference in \u0027btrfs_zone_finish_endio()\u0027:\n\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000011: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f]\n CPU: 4 PID: 2332440 Comm: kworker/u80:15 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-kts+ #4\n Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020\n Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]\n\n RSP: 0018:ffff88867f107a90 EFLAGS: 00010206\n RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff893e5534\n RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088\n RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1081696028\n R10: ffff88840b4b0143 R11: ffff88834dfff600 R12: ffff88840b4b0000\n R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888530ad5210\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888e3f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f87223fff38 CR3: 00000007a7c6a002 CR4: 00000000007706f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27\n ? die_addr+0x46/0x70\n ? exc_general_protection+0x14f/0x250\n ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30\n ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70\n ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]\n btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x5d9/0x19a0 [btrfs]\n ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10\n ? do_raw_write_lock+0x90/0x260\n ? __pfx_do_raw_write_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]\n ? _raw_write_unlock+0x23/0x40\n ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x5a9/0x850 [btrfs]\n ? lock_acquire+0x435/0x500\n btrfs_work_helper+0x1b1/0xa70 [btrfs]\n ? __schedule+0x10a8/0x60b0\n ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10\n process_one_work+0x862/0x1410\n ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10\n ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240\n worker_thread+0x5e6/0x1010\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0\n ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xce/0x110\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nEnabling CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT revealed the following assertion to\ntrigger:\n\n assertion failed: !list_empty(\u0026ordered-\u003elist), in fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1815\n\nThis indicates, that we\u0027re missing the checksums list on the\nordered_extent. As btrfs/167 is doing a NOCOW write this is to be\nexpected.\n\nFurther analysis with drgn confirmed the assumption:\n\n \u003e\u003e\u003e inode = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[11][\u0027ordered\u0027].inode\n \u003e\u003e\u003e btrfs_inode = drgn.container_of(inode, \"struct btrfs_inode\", \\\n \t\t\t\t\"vfs_inode\")\n \u003e\u003e\u003e print(btrfs_inode.flags)\n (u32)1\n\nAs zoned emulation mode simulates conventional zones on regular devices,\nwe cannot use zone-append for writing. But we\u0027re only attaching dummy\nchecksums if we\u0027re doing a zone-append write.\n\nSo for NOCOW zoned data writes on conventional zones, also attach a\ndummy checksum.",
"id": "GHSA-hx58-3fx6-hp8m",
"modified": "2025-01-07T18:30:43Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T15:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/082b3d4e788953a3ff42ecdb70c4210149076285"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25cfe59f4470a051d1b80f51fa0ca3a5048e4a19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cebae292e0c32a228e8f2219c270a7237be24a6a"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.