GHSA-J2G9-P996-478M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:10 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:38
VLAI?
Details
Integer signedness error in rtfsr.dll in Autonomy KeyView 10.4 and 10.9, as used in multiple IBM, Symantec, and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted \ls keyword in a list override table entry in an RTF file, which triggers a buffer overflow.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-0134"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-08-17T20:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer signedness error in rtfsr.dll in Autonomy KeyView 10.4 and 10.9, as used in multiple IBM, Symantec, and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted \\ls keyword in a list override table entry in an RTF file, which triggers a buffer overflow.",
"id": "GHSA-j2g9-p996-478m",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:38:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T06:10:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0134"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-27"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21440812"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41928"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory\u0026pvid=security_advisory\u0026year=2010\u0026suid=20100727_01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…