ghsa-j2p5-74xw-f54p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:24
Modified
2022-05-02 03:24
Details

Mutt 1.5.19, when linked against (1) OpenSSL (mutt_ssl.c) or (2) GnuTLS (mutt_ssl_gnutls.c), allows connections when only one TLS certificate in the chain is accepted instead of verifying the entire chain, which allows remote attackers to spoof trusted servers via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-1390"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-06-16T21:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Mutt 1.5.19, when linked against (1) OpenSSL (mutt_ssl.c) or (2) GnuTLS (mutt_ssl_gnutls.c), allows connections when only one TLS certificate in the chain is accepted instead of verifying the entire chain, which allows remote attackers to spoof trusted servers via a man-in-the-middle attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2p5-74xw-f54p",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:24:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:24:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/51068"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-June/msg00715.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/64bf199c8d8a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/8f11dd00c770"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/06/10/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35288"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.