GHSA-J325-FPCG-5HQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:51 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:51
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in the web tool for MySQL MaxDB before 7.5.00.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) an HTTP GET request with a long file parameter after a percent ("%") sign or (2) a long Lock-Token string to the WebDAV functionality, which is not properly handled by the getLockTokenHeader function in WDVHandler_CommonUtils.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-0684"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-04-25T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the web tool for MySQL MaxDB before 7.5.00.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) an HTTP GET request with a long file parameter after a percent (\"%\") sign or (2) a long Lock-Token string to the WebDAV functionality, which is not properly handled by the getLockTokenHeader function in WDVHandler_CommonUtils.c.",
"id": "GHSA-j325-fpcg-5hqf",
"modified": "2022-05-01T01:51:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T01:51:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0684"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/changes/changes_7.5.00.26.html#WebDAV"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=234\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=235\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13368"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…