ghsa-j4vg-xpv6-9x2m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:58
Modified
2022-05-14 02:58
Severity ?
Details
ISC BIND 9.1.0 through 9.8.4-P2 and 9.9.0 through 9.9.2-P2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via malformed options data in an OPT resource record.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-2848", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-10-21T10:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "ISC BIND 9.1.0 through 9.8.4-P2 and 9.9.0 through 9.9.2-P2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via malformed options data in an OPT resource record.", id: "GHSA-j4vg-xpv6-9x2m", modified: "2022-05-14T02:58:20Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:58:20Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2848", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385450", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01433/74/CVE-2016-2848", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0002", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0005", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://source.isc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=bind9.git;a=commit;h=4adf97c32fcca7d00e5756607fd045f2aab9c3d4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2093.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2094.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2099.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93809", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93814", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037073", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.