ghsa-j62m-465v-c87q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:58
Modified
2022-05-17 04:58
Details

The phone-proxy implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.0.3.6 and earlier does not properly validate X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection-database corruption) via an invalid entry, aka Bug ID CSCui33299.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-6682"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-11-13T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The phone-proxy implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.0.3.6 and earlier does not properly validate X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection-database corruption) via an invalid entry, aka Bug ID CSCui33299.",
  "id": "GHSA-j62m-465v-c87q",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:58:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:58:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-6682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-6682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=31692"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.