ghsa-j877-4r2v-qxff
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
In elfutils 0.175, a heap-based buffer over-read was discovered in the function elf32_xlatetom in elf32_xlatetom.c in libelf. A crafted ELF input can cause a segmentation fault leading to denial of service (program crash) because ebl_core_note does not reject malformed core file notes.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-7665" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-125" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-02-09T16:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In elfutils 0.175, a heap-based buffer over-read was discovered in the function elf32_xlatetom in elf32_xlatetom.c in libelf. A crafted ELF input can cause a segmentation fault leading to denial of service (program crash) because ebl_core_note does not reject malformed core file notes.", "id": "GHSA-j877-4r2v-qxff", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:45Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:45Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-7665" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2197" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3575" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/02/msg00036.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00030.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24089" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/ml/elfutils-devel/2019-q1/msg00049.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4012-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00052.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.