GHSA-J88G-9FP9-644J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:06 – Updated: 2022-05-02 00:06
VLAI?
Details
Tools/faqwiz/move-faqwiz.sh (aka the generic FAQ wizard moving tool) in Python 2.4.5 might allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a tmp$RANDOM.tmp temporary file. NOTE: there may not be common usage scenarios in which tmp$RANDOM.tmp is located in an untrusted directory.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-4108"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-59"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-09-18T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Tools/faqwiz/move-faqwiz.sh (aka the generic FAQ wizard moving tool) in Python 2.4.5 might allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a tmp$RANDOM.tmp temporary file. NOTE: there may not be common usage scenarios in which tmp$RANDOM.tmp is located in an untrusted directory.",
"id": "GHSA-j88g-9fp9-644j",
"modified": "2022-05-02T00:06:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:06:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45161"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498899"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=122148330903513\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=122152861617434\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31184"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020904"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2659"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…