ghsa-j984-q4qc-6qxf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:50
Modified
2023-08-04 23:10
Severity ?
Summary
librsvg DoS via Cyclic References
Details
librsvg before 2.40.12 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop, stack consumption, and application crash) via cyclic references in an SVG document.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "crates.io", name: "librsvg", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "2.40.12", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-7558", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2023-08-04T23:10:05Z", nvd_published_at: "2016-05-20T14:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "librsvg before 2.40.12 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop, stack consumption, and application crash) via cyclic references in an SVG document.", id: "GHSA-j984-q4qc-6qxf", modified: "2023-08-04T23:10:05Z", published: "2022-05-17T03:50:02Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7558", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268243", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/commit/?id=a51919f7e1ca9c535390a746fbf6e28c8402dc61", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/GNOME/librsvg", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3584", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/21/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/30/3", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "librsvg DoS via Cyclic References", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.