ghsa-j9x6-5wqj-262h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:06
Modified
2022-05-17 04:06
Details

The call-handling implementation in Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 before 8.5(1)SU7, 8.6 before 8.6(2a)SU4, 9.x before 9.1(2)SU2, and 10.0 before 10.0(1)SU1, when SIP trunk integration is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (port consumption) by improperly terminating SIP sessions, aka Bug ID CSCul28089.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-0615"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-03T18:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The call-handling implementation in Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 before 8.5(1)SU7, 8.6 before 8.6(2a)SU4, 9.x before 9.1(2)SU2, and 10.0 before 10.0(1)SU1, when SIP trunk integration is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (port consumption) by improperly terminating SIP sessions, aka Bug ID CSCul28089.",
  "id": "GHSA-j9x6-5wqj-262h",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:06:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:06:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0615"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150401-cuc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032010"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.