GHSA-JCF2-RFFV-4HWP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-09 21:30 – Updated: 2025-03-09 21:30
VLAI?
Details

Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed because the documentation states "when using [the debug] library ... its functions violate basic assumptions about Lua code (e.g., that ... Lua programs do not crash)."

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-26205"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-09T21:15:35Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed because the documentation states \"when using [the debug] library ... its functions violate basic assumptions about Lua code (e.g., that ... Lua programs do not crash).\"",
  "id": "GHSA-jcf2-rffv-4hwp",
  "modified": "2025-03-09T21:30:53Z",
  "published": "2025-03-09T21:30:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26205"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/u/2/g/lua-l/c/CmoRk8AAjX0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.