ghsa-jcfv-wjcf-phjg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:08
Modified
2022-05-17 05:08
Details
block/scsi_ioctl.c in the Linux kernel through 3.8 does not properly consider the SCSI device class during authorization of SCSI commands, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via an SG_IO ioctl call that leverages overlapping opcodes.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-4542" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-02-28T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "block/scsi_ioctl.c in the Linux kernel through 3.8 does not properly consider the SCSI device class during authorization of SCSI commands, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via an SG_IO ioctl call that leverages overlapping opcodes.", "id": "GHSA-jcfv-wjcf-phjg", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:08:37Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:08:37Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4542" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875360" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=redpatch.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=76a274e17114abf1a77de6b651424648ce9e10c8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=redpatch.git;a=commit;h=76a274e17114abf1a77de6b651424648ce9e10c8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel\u0026m=135903967015813\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel\u0026m=135904012416042\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0496.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0579.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0882.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0928.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.