GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-JCVH-XF52-2CWM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-03 18:02 – Updated: 2026-09-03 18:02
VLAI
Summary
ffuf denial of service (OOM) via HTTP response decompression bomb
Details

Summary

A malicious or attacker-controlled target server can crash ffuf with an out-of-memory condition by returning a compressed HTTP response that decompresses to a very large body (a decompression bomb). This works against default usage with no special flags.

### Details

The response body size guard in pkg/runner/simple.go only checks the server-supplied Content-Length header, which reflects the compressed size and is absent for chunked responses or when Go's net/http transport transparently decompresses the body. After that check, io.ReadAll reads the entire decompressed stream into memory with no upper bound, so a small compressed body that expands to gigabytes causes unbounded allocation and the process is terminated by the OS OOM killer.

The guard is bypassed in three independent ways:

  1. gzip (default configuration): the transport requests gzip on its own and transparently decompresses the response, stripping Content-Encoding and Content-Length, so the size check is skipped and the already-decoded body is read unbounded.
  2. brotli/deflate (or gzip with headers preserved): Content-Length reflects the small compressed size and passes the check; the body is then manually decompressed into an unbounded io.ReadAll.
  3. chunked transfer encoding: no Content-Length header is present, so the numeric parse fails and the check is skipped entirely.

### Impact

Denial of service against the operator running ffuf. A single hostile endpoint can OOM-kill ffuf on a default invocation such as ffuf -u http://target/FUZZ -w wordlist.txt, discarding all in-memory scan results. Because the crash recurs on every attempt against that target, a server can effectively make itself immune to ffuf-based content discovery. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact; only the availability of the scanning process is affected. CVSS 3.1 base score 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), CWE-409 (Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data).

### Patches

Fixed in ffuf 2.2.0 (https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/releases/tag/v2.2.0) via https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/pull/897. The response body read is now bounded with io.LimitReader to the existing 5 MB download cap regardless of Content-Encoding, chunked framing, or transport-level decompression; responses exceeding the cap are dropped rather than read into memory. Upgrade to 2.2.0 or later.

### Workarounds

There is no configuration flag that fully mitigates this in affected versions. Until upgrading, limit ffuf usage against untrusted or attacker-influenced targets. Upgrading to 2.2.0 is the fix.

### Credits

Reported by João Tricta (Hakai Offensive Security).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.1.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/ffuf/ffuf/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/ffuf/ffuf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-73232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-409"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-03T18:02:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T20:18:48Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n  A malicious or attacker-controlled target server can crash ffuf with an out-of-memory condition by returning a compressed HTTP response that decompresses to a very large body (a decompression\n  bomb). This works against default usage with no special flags.\n\n  ### Details\n\n  The response body size guard in `pkg/runner/simple.go` only checks the server-supplied `Content-Length` header, which reflects the *compressed* size and is absent for chunked responses or when Go\u0027s\n  `net/http` transport transparently decompresses the body. After that check, `io.ReadAll` reads the entire *decompressed* stream into memory with no upper bound, so a small compressed body that\n  expands to gigabytes causes unbounded allocation and the process is terminated by the OS OOM killer.\n\n  The guard is bypassed in three independent ways:\n\n  1. **gzip (default configuration):** the transport requests gzip on its own and transparently decompresses the response, stripping `Content-Encoding` and `Content-Length`, so the size check is\n  skipped and the already-decoded body is read unbounded.\n  2. **brotli/deflate (or gzip with headers preserved):** `Content-Length` reflects the small compressed size and passes the check; the body is then manually decompressed into an unbounded\n  `io.ReadAll`.\n  3. **chunked transfer encoding:** no `Content-Length` header is present, so the numeric parse fails and the check is skipped entirely.\n\n  ### Impact\n\n  Denial of service against the operator running ffuf. A single hostile endpoint can OOM-kill ffuf on a default invocation such as `ffuf -u http://target/FUZZ -w wordlist.txt`, discarding all\n  in-memory scan results. Because the crash recurs on every attempt against that target, a server can effectively make itself immune to ffuf-based content discovery. There is no confidentiality or\n  integrity impact; only the availability of the scanning process is affected. CVSS 3.1 base score 7.5 (`AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`), CWE-409 (Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data).\n\n  ### Patches\n\n  Fixed in **ffuf 2.2.0** (https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/releases/tag/v2.2.0) via https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/pull/897. The response body read is now bounded with `io.LimitReader` to the existing 5\n  MB download cap regardless of `Content-Encoding`, chunked framing, or transport-level decompression; responses exceeding the cap are dropped rather than read into memory. Upgrade to 2.2.0 or later.\n\n  ### Workarounds\n\n  There is no configuration flag that fully mitigates this in affected versions. Until upgrading, limit ffuf usage against untrusted or attacker-influenced targets. Upgrading to 2.2.0 is the fix.\n\n  ### Credits\n\n  Reported by **Jo\u00e3o Tricta** (Hakai Offensive Security).",
  "id": "GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm",
  "modified": "2026-09-03T18:02:09Z",
  "published": "2026-09-03T18:02:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/security/advisories/GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/pull/897"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/commit/fb0da86c60443b0dddbc9a86e91e3a6487dff79b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf/releases/tag/v2.2.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ffuf denial of service (OOM) via HTTP response decompression bomb"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…