GHSA-JF55-3J9H-GRF2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:02 – Updated: 2025-01-16 21:30
VLAI?
Details
** DISPUTED ** Sudo 1.6.8p7 on SuSE Linux 9.3, and possibly other Linux distributions, allows local users to gain privileges by using sudo to call su, then entering a blank password and hitting CTRL-C. NOTE: SuSE and multiple third-party researchers have not been able to replicate this issue, stating "Sudo catches SIGINT and returns an empty string for the password so I don't see how this could happen unless the user's actual password was empty."
Severity ?
8.4 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-1831"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-31T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** Sudo 1.6.8p7 on SuSE Linux 9.3, and possibly other Linux distributions, allows local users to gain privileges by using sudo to call su, then entering a blank password and hitting CTRL-C. NOTE: SuSE and multiple third-party researchers have not been able to replicate this issue, stating \"Sudo catches SIGINT and returns an empty string for the password so I don\u0027t see how this could happen unless the user\u0027s actual password was empty.\"",
"id": "GHSA-jf55-3j9h-grf2",
"modified": "2025-01-16T21:30:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:02:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2005-05/0349.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2005-05/0359.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111755694008928\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/20417"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…